WAKEY, WAKEY…

Wakey, wakey… it’s over now!

I’m willing to admit I’m a rugby purist and generally never complain if there is a lot of kicking and set piece through a tough tussle, but tonight it went a little too far and it actually got frustrating. God help anyone who convinced someone new to rugby to watch this game.

One of the teams just needed to take a risk and run it. Both Wales and South Africa looked rudderless and if the Boks play like this against England they are likely to go home embarrassed, because the Poms will put 40 on them. I don’t believe the Boks will be able to Bully England like they have with other sides. So they better have a much better plan than they had tonight.

An interesting game awaits us all, but based on form and improvement trajectory, my money is on Eddie and England. Oh 4 years of pain listening to the reminders. 🤦🏻‍♂️

WAKEY, WAKEY…

HATS OFF TO THE ABs

HATS OFF TO THE ALL BLACKS BUT THERE’S ALWAYS A SILVER LINING

RWC RANT NO.15

Rant 15 AB winnersw.jpg

I thought it was fitting to end my RWC Rants on No.15 so I will try and keep it relatively short and too the point – if that’s possible?

Not the result any Wallabies fan or player was after and as disappointing as it may be it’s actually never as tough when victory goes to your closest rival and one you actually respect, and to a side that genuinely earned it and deserved it. It was an incredible effort by both teams, but on the day the ABs showed why they are rightly the World Champions.

Nothing can change the outcome, history has been written so let’s not try and make excuses – don’t blame any refereeing decisions, don’t point fingers at particular players and don’t devalue the effort of either side by saying it was good or bad luck. Let’s look at it holistically and learn from it. The reason the ABs won was because of their attitude, their culture, their skill level, their resilience and their honour (mana). All of this culminates into the success we all see on the field but its genesis started 12 years ago and you can rest assured it didn’t come easily to the ABs and they worked just as bloody hard for this win as they did for the 80 previous games and that’s the difference. In fact, it is often harder to keep a successful team winning than turning around the fortunes of a mediocre side.

I’ve mentioned this before and it’s worth mentioning again because as we all know the devil is in the detail. After the 2003 RWC, Graham Henry took over the reigns and recognised the AB team was surviving on natural ability with little substance and what was totally absent was a positive culture. That was the turning point and he took measures to fix it. Is it ringing any bells yet? Henry wanted to build and develop a culture that was virtually impenetrable and could survive the test of time. He and his brains trust, all very smart and accomplished rugby minds, along with the senior playing group recognised one single focus “You’re an All Black 24/7”. The All Black manager at the time, former player, captain and coach Brian Lochore captured the essence perfectly coining the phrase “Better people make better All Blacks”. Henry’s legacy was perpetuated and improved by one of his former Lieutenants, Steve Hansen and hopefully it will continue to evolve – well that’s the challenge.

On the larger side of the ditch someone else had similar thoughts, Michael Cheika understood that overarching concept perfectly. He recognised the importance of establishing high standards and developing a winning culture. He understood that once it connects within the playing group, it transfers on to the field and that’s how you fill the trophy cabinet. He proved his way worked with the Waratahs and he has just proven it again with the leaps and bounds he has made with the current Wallabies. Let’s face it, most of us didn’t think the Wallabies would make the 2015 RWC final this time last year and the rest of you are liars.

It’s not rocket science and it’s not a new concept, Dwyer did it in 91 and Macqueen did it again in 99 albeit with different styles and approaches, and Cheika almost did it in 2015 but just might do it in 2019 – or will he? The Wallabies have come so far in such a short space of time and there in lies the silver lining. If Cheika has achieved this within 12 months surely things can only improve as he develops a stronger more resilient outfit over the next three to four years. As supporters let’s not lose faith, we have what it takes, we just need a little more time.

Once again congratulations to the All Blacks for a splendid display of clinical brilliance and onwards and upwards for the Wallabies.

The march towards 2019 glory has already begun.

HATS OFF TO THE ABs

THERE’S ALWAYS A BUT…

RWC RANT NO.14

Rant 14 Simmons

As fans, pundits, coaches or even players, are we ever really totally satisfied when our national team plays? The answer is rarely yes and if it is, the ‘yes’ is a prefix for the ‘but…’

This morning’s victory wasn’t a succinct series of plays that meticulously dismantled the Pumas. There were some fantastic aspects and some not so good ones but does it really matter whether we win pretty or ugly? In my book, a win is a win regardless. And we won and join the All Blacks to battle it out for bragging rights.

The team now has a week to rest, recuperate and recover, at the same time make a few adjustments, realign a few things and practice the plays designed to bring ‘Bill’ back onto Australian shores. There’s no doubt the mountain ahead is steep, the terrain will be arduous and will require the alignment of certain stars, but it’s highly possible. I mentioned in previous comments all the pressure is on the ABs, they’re the favourites, they’re the current champions and they are in No.1 spot. This is the best possible situation for Cheika and the Wallabies, and I reckon Cheika is salivating at this opportunity.

So here’s the call. Can the Wallabies do it? Yes they can, it is entirely possible because finally they have a level of self-belief and resilience they haven’t had within the inner sanctum since 1999, possibly 2003. They are one of the few side to have beaten the ABs recently. But the most relevant point is they haven’t peaked during this tournament yet like the ABs did against France. Think about it, they’ve shown incredible skill in certain areas during the pool matches, quarters and even in the semi but never all during the same game and may be this weekend is that time? How do the ABs prepare against a side that is not playing a consistent style? Possibly by playing their own style and sticking to it?

Rest assured the ABs won’t be handing anything over easily but nor will the Wallabies. For green and gold glory to consume us for the next 4 years the following has to happen:

1) Genia needs to get his passing rhythm right and eliminate that dumb floating rubbish to the awaiting forward pod because that’s an intercept in the making and that kind of pass has A Smith or TJP written all over it. He either needs to not kick or learn how to kick this week.

2) Forwards need to get better organised around the breakdown and either get around the corner or pick and drive with more efficiency – I also apportion blame at Genia as well.

3) Moore needs to make the ref aware of illegal binding in the frontrow, so Kepu and Slipper (Sio?) need to talk to their captain more because Franks and Moody wont’ be playing fair.

4) Kurindrani needs to fire up and show some of that stuff that earned him his reputation and a place in the Wallabies – he’s been pretty quiet in attack all tournament.

5) The referee needs to be consistent throughout the game regardless of his interpretation.

I dedicate this post to the majestic moment when a member of the tight 5 score an intercept try. The only thing that could have made it better was if it were a prop. Glory days!

THERE’S ALWAYS A BUT…

IT DOESN’T MATTER WHO MAKES THE FINAL THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE STILL WINS.

RWC RANT NO.13

rant 13.jpg

After the All Blacks demolition of France with such ruthless precision, no sensible pundit would have doubted they had a better than average chance of winning their semi-final against the Springbok, albeit by a pretty slim margin. What South Africa showed is their lack of ability to change and adapt their style. They hedge their bets on bullying but nowadays it fails more than it succeeds. The All Blacks showed they can maintain composure regardless of what is thrown at them.

The second semi is bound to be a cracker as the Wallabies try and tame the confident Pumas. Naturally I would love nothing more than to see another epic encounter between Australian and New Zealand but I won’t count my chickens just yet. What is really intriguing me is how the crowd will react to the both teams in the final consider it will be a Southern Hemisphere showpiece hosted by the North?

Will they simply cheer for whoever is playing against the ABs to prevent them from rewriting history and pushing rugby parity even further from the northerner’s reach? Or will they want to see the bar lifted to new heights and want to watch a game for the game itself?

If the Pumas get up I think they are likely to win support from the northern crowds because they’re not Australian or New Zealanders and they’ll be happy not to see the Aussies or Kiwis win the Cup for a THIRD time.

If it’s the Wallabies I think they’ll be counting on every ex-pat and tourists who have travelled for support as the crowds are still seething over Scotland’s supposed controversial exit and they simply couldn’t bring themselves to support anything wearing green and gold. There might be some support from the French?

If Australia earn the right to take on the All Blacks they will actually be in a far stronger position psychologically than the ABs for a few logical reasons:

(1) Nobody actually expected them to make the final.

(2) the crowd will probably be against them and they will start as genuine underdog – exactly where Cheika would want them.

(3) All the pressure is on the ABs to maintain their final’s form, be the first team to win three RWCs and be inaugural back to back winners – a record unlikely to be broken for a long, long time.

Whatever the outcome I hope it’s better than the last RWC final, but ultimately it won’t matter who wins because we in the south can still blow raspberries at the north.

IT DOESN’T MATTER WHO MAKES THE FINAL THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE STILL WINS.

Some Innovate. Some Imitate. Southern Hemisphere Dominate.

RWC RANT NO. 12

Firstly, well done to the Wallabies – another get out of jail free card used up but it was very pleasing to see. What is also nice is the way the Southern Hemisphere is performing on the field and how the Northern Hemisphere is performing well off the field. Other than the annoying time difference watching from Down Under, I think the UK has done a splendid job hosting this year’s Cup, but I guess the best judges of that are all my friends who experienced it first hand – I’m still very envious.

The contrast says it all
The contrast says it all

This RWC has proven my long-held theory that authentic innovation in rugby develops in the Southern Hemisphere and those in the north merely try to replicate it. Don’t believe me? The proof is in the pudding; look at the teams in the quarterfinals, NZ, France, SA, Ireland, Argentina, Wales, Scotland and Australia. Every nation in the Rugby Championship made it out of their pool and after last weekend, everyone one of them is still present and account for, but none from the North. Mind you all the teams in the quarters from the north – other than France, who were not only outclassed but humiliated by the All Blacks – did much better than they ever have before and should stand proud and tall. Why did they all do better? A common thread; they all had a Southern Hemisphere coach who transformed they way they approached the game and played the game a la Schmidt, Cotter and Gatland – take a bow gentlemen. Truth be known, it could have gone either way if Ireland weren’t struck as heavily with injuries, if Joubert wasn’t refereeing and if the Boks didn’t lose to Japan – but the would haves, could haves, should haves don’t matter in the end. It is what it is and the Southern Hemisphere is dominating.

Here’s another view I’ve held since 2003. England won’t win another RWC until they move beyond their current position of arrogance and swallow the bitter pill they’ve been avoiding for 12 years and admit they don’t know everything about rugby and teams simply don’t deserve anything in rugby, they have to genuinely earn it. This is why I believe Lancaster should be given another chance and carte blanche to do it all his way. He is not originally from the establishment and I believe it not only makes a huge difference but it allows him to see things differently. I think he was hamstrung by the ex-internationals he had assisting him, however, as soon as they lost his assistants abandoned him and started pointing the fingers and once again the structure imploded. Let Lancaster take a leaf out of Graham Henry’s book and continue to rebuild and at the same time put the broom through and rid the fold of the non-believers – they have nothing more to lose?

Some may be thinking what about RWC 2003. England won it fair and square! I concede, it wasn’t a fluke but it certainly wasn’t based on Woodward’s originality and innovation. Woodward had three things in his favour, Jonny Wilkinson, an enormous unprecedented budget and Rod Macqueen’s blueprint. Wilkinson is a freak, an absolute master of the boot and without Wilkinson no RWC Championship and let’s not forget it was only by a field goal. Here is where Woodward mastery came into play (mastery not innovation). He had a massive amount of money to spend after 1999 and was astute or cunning enough to closely study the Macqueen machine; the way Macqueen approached managing a professional rugby team. How Macqueen took the psychological development of a professional outfit to a new level and how raising the skill set from 1-15 took the team’s capabilities to new world standards. He saw how Macqueen and Co developed patterns of play that cleverly manipulated the opposition and had the time to watch the end-result from the sideline after England was belted out of the quarters by the Boks, which was a second RWC win by 23 points to the colony. Woodward replicated the plan but with his budget it was almost impossible to fail – mind you had he failed I think he would have been lynched – literally. If you don’t believe me read both Macqueen and Woodward’s books. Hats off, England won but they have been riding that wave ever since and under-performing ever since in spite of their enormous pool of talent. This simply reinforces my original theory that since professionalism, Southern Hemisphere coaches whether they choose to stay in the South or take up postings in the north are naturally more innovative than their Northern Hemisphere counterparts.

I’m not saying England should accept the truth and employ a Southern Hemisphere coach. God forbid, that may give them an above-average chance of winning again and we don’t want that. But guys like Woodward and past members of the 2003 winning team need a reality check; they need to back their own team with some constructive comments and humility, and not make dumb statements about other nations that have no basis other than selling newspapers or getting eyeballs on screens. Sadly, they end up being English Rugby’s own worst enemy and every one of them ended up with egg on their face and lost any remaining plaudits and credibility outside of England.

Just get on with it and stop talking about it.

PS: Scotland should be proud of their performance and their previous greats should mind their manners. I’m certainly no fan of Joubert but his unpredictability applied to both sides and going on about how they were robbed is simply ridiculous – it is what it is. I’ll accept the robbed call if someone can explain how Ford and Gray were cleared on appeal to play in this game after lifting a player’s legs beyond horizontal during a clean out and then driving his head into the ground – now that’s robbery and the key-stone cops performance by those that overturned the already weak suspension makes a mockery of the system on so many levels.

Some Innovate. Some Imitate. Southern Hemisphere Dominate.

Let’s just bathe in the glory for as long as it lasts – Rugby World Cup 2015 Rant

RWC RANT NO.11

How good was the Australia vs Wales game? I don’t think there is one Wallabies fan who wouldn’t be bursting with pride after that game and to hazard a guess the Welsh wouldn’t be too disappointed with the galant effort of their boys either? Despite the old school try-less result it still had the tension of a Hitchcock thriller, gripping right until the end.

The juxtaposition of competition
The juxtaposition of competition

The Game
The Welsh (or was it purely Gatland?) were wise with their tactics, successfully instigating a series of copybook choke tackles, making good use of the high ball and engaging a consistently fast and accurate umbrella defence. The Irish effectively used the same tactic during the 2011 RWC to end the Wallabies campaign and it’s clear this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Whether you judge the Welsh effort as being effective and or successful is subjective, however, it did disrupt the Wallabies flow and slowed their ball dramatically but unlike the Irish, Wales didn’t win. An article I read this morning said Wales tactics gave the Wallabies next opponents an insight into their Achilles heel. It’s a valid point, especially amongst the backs a la Genia being rag dolled however, I can’t imagine these issues won’t be discussed and dealt with swiftly at training.

The Team
Clearly the Wallabies victory was epic but what was most pleasing was the grit, courage and determination, something that has been absent for far too long. This win has validated a number of things namely the team’s collective belief in themselves, the prowess of the brains trust, the ascendency of the Wallabies pack and the demolition of England was well earned and not a flash in the pan. I sincerely hope their level headed approach of focusing on one game at a time – a philosophy I advocate – isn’t populist lip service. Collectively they rallied together and got the job done and now advance to the preferred side of the quarter finals’ draw. As the #tag suggests ‘stronger as one’, is proving to be more than a marketing tag line and now part of the team’s culture, ethos and DNA. The Wallabies defence needs no analysis, two words sum it up pretty well – friggin awesome!

The Forwards
Surprisingly the lineout is still off and this is a priority, a must fix before taking on some less forgiving opponents. Our speed on the ground was poor, as was the throw and the calls need to be smarter. Ahh the Wallaby scrum, finally it has elevated itself to be of world standard no thanks to Ledesma. Of course it makes me smile but at the same time it’s where we should have been for the past 12 seasons. Clearly our adopted Argentinian brother has the ability to translate the complicated theory into practice. The breakdown work was adequate but not dominant and it needs to be; why the Wallabies are copying so many other teams and leaving their feet at rucks is beyond me, it isn’t playing to their strengths and definitely reducing opportunities elsewhere. The forward runners are still too one dimensional, virtually no tip ons, pops off the ground and the clean out was way less effective than it has been but to be fair I think Joubert played a part in that.

The Backs
I’ll have to watch a replay a few more times to decide if the Wallaby backs just had an off night or if the ‘hard up and in’ defensive structure successfully crowded the Aussies’ attack to a point where they lost all space to create. Not that I’m a backs expert but if the waves of basic second man plays aren’t working I thought some more unders lines running would be justified, short punches through on the toe in behind the centres with an aggressive chase or sweeping back in the opposite direction to catch some of the tight five napping would have been tried more often? Or may be Cheika is playing the biggest mind game of them all and only releasing certain plays and trying to win in certain ways until the semis and possibly the final, where the wrath of the Gods will be unleashed to not only do the unthinkable and win a RWC only having taken over the team 12 months prior, but to cement a place in history as the coach of the first Nation to win 3 RWCs? …And possibly receive a blank cheque from the ARU?

The Referee
I usually check who’s refereeing beforehand, but as the telecast began I saw Craig Joubert. As my shoulders slumped, the first words out of my mouth were, ‘bloody hell, looks like we’ll being playing South Africa in the quarters (the censored version). His refereeing style and interpretation of the laws are certainly unique. Interestingly, he made some really intelligent decisions but he also ignored many ruck, maul, obstruction and scrum infringements along the way. I take exception to him ignoring both captains’ questions. Maintaining control is one thing but being as arrogant as he is doesn’t do the game any favours. He wasn’t consistent with his adjudication, his in-game communication was extremely poor and some of his explanations epitomised his pomposity. I’m not criticising the yellow cards he dealt but there should have been 2-3 more. Moreover, he needs to realise, along with a few others, it’s not about him, referees are there to manage the game and not to try and be a superstar within it. I guess ego enjoys many faces but if Joubert is one of the elite, it’s a sad inditement on what’s likely to come. The quality of referees has been in decline over the past 10-12 years but I guess it is what it is?

This is proving to be one of the most enjoyable World Cups to date and based on the results thus far it is likely to be a great final irrespective of the teams. What I’d love to see is a final hosted by the Northern Hemisphere featuring two Southern Hemisphere teams, which is highly possible. I know, pure evil. 😈

Let’s just bathe in the glory for as long as it lasts – Rugby World Cup 2015 Rant

A FEW SHORT SHARP POINTS

RWC RANT NO. 10

Rant 10.jpg

ON FIJI

I agree with all my fellow pundits; Fiji definitely got the short straw and could have achieved so much more in a different pool, but that’s life and as they say ‘that’s the luck of the draw’ – mind you I think it was more contrived than luck. But it’s clear many underestimated the ability of the Fijians, which was again reaffirmed with Wales securing an equally unconvincing win as England and the Wallabies considering the difference in funding, player drain and professional infrastructure. The Flying Fijians should put Uruguay to the sword, giving them one good win for the tournament, which should provide a deserved silver lining of more Fijian players securing overseas contracts so they can continue playing high level rugby between World Cups. I believe they will be a very different team in Japan in 4 years time. Hopefully McKee hangs around. They certainly seem to be responding and adjusting to some much needed structured play to set them up for their flamboyance.

ON AUSTRALIA V ENGLAND

It will either be a ‘must win game’ or ‘must not lose game’ and there is a big difference. The way the coach and team decide on the approach comes down to the level of pressure applied. If we’re talking about pressure, there’s a great deal more on Lancaster than Cheika and the weight on the English team’s shoulders eclipses their Wallaby counterparts. Both coaches had to make significant changes in multiple areas but Lancaster has had since 2011, while Cheika was only appointed in 2014 just before the end of season tour. Wallaby fans have their fingers and toes crossed but have the escape clause of saying we’ve done better than we thought we would based on how the team was travelling before Cheika came on board. Whereas, the English have been steadily talking it up and they are the home nation with their usual air of arrogance. Twickenham will be more of a pressure cooker for England than the Aussies, but that crowd singing ‘Swing Low’ can smoother the confidence out of any team and has got to be worth at least 10-15 points. There are two things I am hoping for, firstly, the game doesn’t turn into a kicking competition and, second the referee is consistent with the way the laws have been adjudicated so far in the tournament. For mine, England will adopt the ‘we must not lose’ mentality and that may be the flaw in their system, whereas the Wallabies will be more laidback and adopt the same as usual ‘one win at a time’ approach. I think it will be close almost too close to call. But I think the Wallabies may be get the edge.

RUGBY MAINTAINS ITS POPULARITY

While I enjoy watching a bit of league (go the mighty Red Vs) Rugby is my No.1 sporting passion, so when given the chance I’ll put the boot in. The current figures confirm that rugby union – the original game – still monsters league at an international level (Soccer/Football will not enter this conversation).

Here are the facts:

– 2013 Rugby League World Cup – Total attendance figures approx. 570,000 (Host Nation, England)

– 2015 Rugby World Cup – Total attendance during pool matches so far approx. 983,000 (Host Nation, England). Final figure will be well over 1 million! BOOYAH! Proving rugby is truly an international game and league is a limping counterfeit.

A FEW SHORT SHARP POINTS

NO SURPRISES BUT DECISIONS STILL TO BE MADE

RWC RANT NO.9

RANT 9.jpg

There are no major surprises in the Wallabies 1st XV but the bench may be causing Cheika & Co some headaches. It will be interesting to see the final cut and I think it will be the difference between the Wallabies winning and losing the game.

The starting XV

1. Scott Sio (12 Tests)
2. Stephen Moore (c) (97 Tests)
3. Sekope Kepu (58 Tests)
4. Kane Douglas (18 Tests)
5. Rob Simmons (55 Tests)
6. Scott Fardy (25 Tests)
7. Michael Hooper (vc) (47 Tests)
8. David Pocock (51 Tests)
9. Will Genia (61 Tests)
10. Bernard Foley (22 Tests)
11. Rob Horne (28 Tests)
12. Matt Giteau (97 Tests)
13. Tevita Kuridrani (25 Tests)
14. Adam Ashley-Cooper (vc) (109 Tests)
15. Israel Folau (34 Tests)

If I was a betting man I’d have to say TPN and Phipps will be on the ticket. The decision between Carter, Mumm, McMahon and McCalman is a tough one. Then there’s Holmes or Smith for the back up prop? It’s hard to predict if Cheika goes for a 5/3 or 6/2 split. Beale has got to be in there somewhere for his versatility as does Toomua, but what to do with Speight, Mitchell and Tomane? I’m not even going to mention Cooper, and Hanson will remain in his No.1s up in the stand and will cover anything that happens down the track. I wonder if he’ll go with his gut or will he let statistics dictate the line up based on what is likely to beat England?

If I had to select the reserves right now it would be a 5/3 split with the following players:

1. TPN (next best rake),
2. Holmes (if Slipper is out),
3. McMahon (because speed to the breakdown will be key and his energy after the 60min mark may be needed),
4. Carter (for his bulk later in the game and lineout ability if Simmons or Douglas gets hurt – although Mumm has the European experience),
5. McCalman (he offers a better balance of playing tight and wide, which would complement someone like Hooper more efficiently than Mumm),
6. Phipps (no other specialist choice and better than testing Giteau at 9),
7. Toomua (Defence, taking it to the line, can cover 10 and 12), and
8. Beale (Can cover wing or fullback, is a risk but his creativity has won us more than it’s lost us games).

Australia vs England at Twickenham, Saturday, October 3, 8:00pm local time (6:00am Sunday AEDT)

NO SURPRISES BUT DECISIONS STILL TO BE MADE

SCRUMS – FOR THOSE THAT DIDN’T WEAR 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5

RWC RANT NO. 8

Rant 8.jpg

Author’s Note: If you love your rugby but you’re not into scrums you shouldn read this, but if you love scrums it’s all rudimentary so you can give it a miss.

What I love about the RWC is it unites people from all walks of life and brings new fans to the game every 4 years. What prompted me to write this was a conversation I had during lunch with a mate today and he was telling me his niece was trying to learn more about rugby and gain a better understanding of the game. And let’s face it, sometimes this game can be confusing even to those of us who have played, coached and have watched it for years, so spare a thought for the newbies and when it comes to scrummaging it must be confusing at times when penalties are awarded.

As a proud former member of the engine room, I love talking about scrums and anything to do with collisions, pushing or lifting that happens on the field. And yes, forwards generally speak another language when it comes to scrums because of the plethora of permutations that can occur during each body-part movement, so when it comes to talking about scrums – even among rugby friends – I either get the lean forward, the blank stare or the crossed arms accompanied by the rolling of the eyes.

So here it goes! Scrums, love them or hate them they’re part of the game and I hope they continue to stay and remain a genuine contest for the ball. But what I fail to understand is why the referees still get so many scrum penalties wrong? It’s been happening during this World Cup and it was rife during the Wales vs England game, and it will be happening when the Wallabies take on England this Sunday morning. Currently, teams are infringing before the ball has even entered the scrum – nothing new there – and I certainly haven’t got a problem with props trying to get an edge and yes, some may say it’s cheating – but it’s only cheating if you get caught – my issue is the number of times the ref awards the penalty to the wrong team. In days gone by, the props simply sorted it out and the smart refs let them do it.

I’m not going to bore anyone who could be bothered reading this with the 10 different things that might happen in the front row which may lead to a penalty, but here’s one or may be two. A prop boring (angling) in on his opponent. It’s occurrence is pretty straight forward and the law is clear. Law 20.1 (j) says the scrum should be stationary and parallel until the ball leaves the scrum half’s hands. Look at the image (prop at the top of the pic with an arrow on his back) and ask this question, is he parallel to the other players? I think not! While I haven’t included a picture, the same theory applies from side-on, you can see whether props backs are straight or slightly arched, if their head is slightly above or below their hips, the angle of their legs from the knee joint and its alignment with their torso, if their knees are in front or behind their hips, the positioning of their feet and their bind on the other prop. They all tell the story and should answer every question the ref needs to know to get the decision right at least 80% of the time. But they still get it wrong.

Surely, if an assistant referee or the TMO can see foul play or a host of other infringements while play is moving they can certainly watch for these things, especially the TMO. As viewers, we often get the aerial view or the side-on ground shot and the pundits pick up all the stuff I mentioned above in a millisecond, so why can’t the TMO tell the ref through the earpiece as he/she is watching it? I’m sure the broadcaster would provide whichever angle they wanted, they would only need to ask. Problem solved?

Here are some facts you didn’t really need to know…

Combined stats from RWC2011, Super Rugby and 6 Nations over the past few seasons relating to scrums.

> Average total time scrums took up during a game: 14 mins 40 sec
> Average number of Scrums per game: 15.6
> Average time of each scrum: 56.2 sec

(some rounding has happened and it’s approximate)

14 minutes is more than 10% of the game so it should warrant some more attention from the referees, I’m just not sure how we transfer the knowledge and get them to apply it correctly?

Not an overly exciting post but I just love scrums!

PS: There are some great articles on this stuff if you’re really interested in it.

SCRUMS – FOR THOSE THAT DIDN’T WEAR 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5

ON COOPER, ENGLAND AND THE B-TEAM

RWC RANT No.7

Rant 7.jpg

On Cooper

How many chances does QC get before the coaches accept what many Wallaby fans and pundits are seeing? In my opinion, Cooper’s game against Uruguay has all but cemented Foley as the starting fly half. Don’t get me wrong, Cooper certainly has talent but he just never seems to be able bring all his skills to the same party. Cooper’s trademark long-range rifle passes are probably better left to the touch game at training, because despite the fact they occasionally stick against inferior opponents, against more seasoned adversaries they are likely to result in an intercept or a hospital pass. While I think he was hard done by with his sinbin, the laws allow for that interpretation and the point is his judo-like throw was unnecessary, which is another example of his inherent poor discipline and ill-regard for the way his actions impact the team. His kicking was abominable, both in general play and for goal. Without any pressure, 5 from 11 simply isn’t good enough if your team and coach are relying on your necessary skills. Now is the time to start rotating Toomua, Beale and Giteau into 10 during training in the event of an injury.

On England

Have no fear I’m always ready to put the boot into England given the chance, just as they love giving anyone from the colony a good shoeing, and while a wry smile adorned my face as Wales put the Old Dart to the sword over the weekend, I will stand up for their captain Chris Robshaw for choosing to go for the try instead the usual boring English way of kicking themselves out of trouble. Robshaw is being unfairly criticised and is wearing the blame alone as Lancaster distanced himself from any blame saying it’s the players that make the decisions on the field. So Mr Lancaster, you didn’t select the players you had faith in to make those tough decisions on the field? Well, he’s certainly a coach I’d put my body on the line for – Not! If England move forward it wont be because of their coach. Robshaw may have made some ordinary decisions during the game but when the pressure is on and the game hangs in the balance and you have two choices – a draw or a win, you go for goal if you have no faith in your team mates however, if you do have faith in the blokes you’re in the trenches with you go for the try to win the game – just look at Japan. Securing the draw wouldn’t have relieved any pressure on England and they still must win next Sunday to keep their chances alive. It will definitely test the mettle of both sides but if the Wallabies arise victorious, the English are unlikely to come out of the pool of death intact.

On some of the others in the B Team

McMahon certainly showed why he should be part of the squad with a bucket load of line bending carries but I would have expected a lot more pilfering and he is still clearly miles behind Pocock and Hooper. McCalman played a lot better than I expected and should be on the bench in place of Palu and/or Skelton, both of who had very little impact against B-Grade opposition. Mumm certainly didn’t take control of the lineout and it only started to hum when Simmons re-entered the frame, which is a worry should he get injured. Toby Smith did enough to justify his place on tour but Holmes should have been given time to stretch his legs and neck. Despite Beale being out of favour with me after the Di Patston fiasco, he is actually looking way more agile than he has in a long time with some reasonable vision and justifies a place on the bench in the next game. This game also confirmed the failed experiment of Speight at 13. Tomane was unimpressive and nothwithstanding breaking a record by scoring a few tries, I wasn’t overly impressed with Mitchell. Granted, he showed glimpses of his old brilliance but he did make a host of schoolboy errors beforehand, which the Wallabies can ill-afford in a big game. The Wallabies achieved what was required on the scoreboard and it gave many of our top tier players a well-deserved rest in preparation for the next game, which is bound to be a cracker! Let’s line that chariot up with our bulbar and get ready to throw it into reserve afterwards!

ON COOPER, ENGLAND AND THE B-TEAM